Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
03/10/2022 4:19 pm
An engineer configured policy-based routing for a destination IP address that does not exist in the routing table .
How is the packet treated through the policy for configuring the set ip default next-hop command?
- A . Packets are not forwarded to the specific next hop.
- B . Packets are forwarded based on the routing table.
- C . Packets are forwarded based on a static route.
- D . Packets are forwarded to the specific next hop.
Suggested Answer: D
Explanation:
The set ip default next-hop command verifies the existence of the destination IP address in the routing table, and…+ if the destination IP address exists, the command does not policy route the packet, but forwards the packet based on the routing table.+ if the destination IP address does not exist, the command policy routes the packet by sending it to the specified next hop.
Reference: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/ip-routed-protocols/47121-pbr-cmds-ce.html
Explanation:
The set ip default next-hop command verifies the existence of the destination IP address in the routing table, and…+ if the destination IP address exists, the command does not policy route the packet, but forwards the packet based on the routing table.+ if the destination IP address does not exist, the command policy routes the packet by sending it to the specified next hop.
Reference: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/ip-routed-protocols/47121-pbr-cmds-ce.html